In the ongoing debate over the merits of smoking restrictions, it seems that libertarians are on the losing side. Science, common sense, and public opinion all back the idea of limiting smoking in public places and other areas where it can cause harm. Even once-vocal libertarian opponents to measures like compulsory seat belts in cars and helmets for motorcyclists have mostly quieted down, recognizing the importance of safety.
The link between smoking and health issues has been well established for decades. In 1950, Oxford epidemiologist Richard Doll first made the connection between smoking and cancer, prompting him to quit himself. Despite efforts by tobacco companies to hide the truth, no one with scientific credibility has disputed Doll’s findings. In fact, statistics show that two out of three people who continue to smoke will die prematurely, and smoking is responsible for nine out of 10 cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The financial burden on an already strained National Health Service due to smoking-related illnesses amounts to billions of pounds annually. It’s clear that smoking is a major public health issue that requires action. While some may see restrictions on smoking as an infringement on individual freedom, the evidence shows that it is necessary for the greater good of society as a whole.
:quality(75)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/elcomercio/QO2GMZT3QZCDXB3UP6ZFPC2YOY.jpg)
