In a controversial editorial, the Washington Post editorial board suggested that replacing American workers with illegal immigrants would benefit the economy. However, economist Charles Payne disagrees with this viewpoint. Payne argues that by replacing American workers with cheaper foreign labor, businesses may save money in the short term, but this drives down wages and job opportunities for Americans.
Payne emphasizes that this issue is not about politics but about the economic impact on American families, as well as the well-being of illegal immigrant workers. Pushing out American workers in favor of cheaper labor may initially benefit businesses, but it has negative consequences for workers and the economy as a whole.
When the economy falters, immigrant workers are often the first to lose their jobs, leaving American workers to bear the brunt of the economic hardships. Increasing the labor supply with cheap immigrant workers ultimately hurts both American workers and the immigrant workers themselves in the long run.
In summary, while businesses may see short-term savings by using cheaper foreign labor to replace American workers, this approach ultimately harms both groups in terms of wages and job opportunities. As an economist who cares about both American families and illegal immigrant workers, Payne urges policymakers to consider more sustainable solutions that benefit everyone involved.
