A councilman from Perry County, Keith Huck, has lost his health insurance coverage after a decision made by the State Court of Appeals. The County Commissioners had voted to remove all part-time employees from the county insurance plan starting in January 2024. In response, Huck filed an injunction in 2023 to challenge this decision.
Despite the commissioners stating that his role as a councilman only required nine hours of work per month, Huck contended that it demanded full-time dedication. A trial court initially sided with him, restoring his health benefits. However, this ruling was appealed by Perry County officials, leading to the original decision being reinstated.
This development means that Huck will now have to find alternative health insurance coverage for himself. The decision by the State Court of Appeals highlights the ongoing debate over the responsibilities and benefits granted to part-time employees within the county government.
The removal of health insurance coverage for part-time employees has become a contentious issue in many counties across the country. While some argue that these employees should be entitled to the same benefits as full-time workers, others believe that they should not receive as much compensation for their reduced workload.
As a result of this debate, many counties have implemented changes to their employee benefit plans in recent years. Some have removed certain benefits altogether or increased premiums for part-time employees, while others have offered more flexible plans that allow employees to choose their own coverage options.
Overall, the decision by the State Court of Appeals is a reminder that issues surrounding employee benefits are complex and multifaceted. As such, it is important for policymakers and employers alike to carefully consider these issues before making decisions about employee compensation and benefits.
