The Finnish government’s stance on the EU’s restoration regulation has been a source of debate and uncertainty, with Member of Parliament Eveliina Heinäluoma questioning the inconsistency in their handling of it. Despite initially voting against the proposal last summer, Finland abstained during tripartite negotiations and now remains steadfast in its decision to vote against it.
The restoration regulation aims to bring binding obligations to improve the state of nature in different habitats, sparking discussion in Finland and the EU. Although Hungary’s changed vote has added complexity to the situation, Finland is determined not to change its position. Minister of the Environment Kai Mykkänen expressed dissatisfaction with the situation and emphasized the need for consistency in EU decision-making.
Heinäluoma believes that Finland missed an opportunity to promote a green transition by not supporting the amended regulation. She compares it to past directives that ultimately benefited Finnish businesses and the environment, urging the government to prioritize coherence and consistency in their decisions. The Council of Member States will continue to debate on this issue as they seek member states to change their minds and vote in favor of
