The election of a new patriarch in Bulgaria is not just about the direction that the Orthodox Church will take, but it also reflects the deep division within Orthodoxy. The tension between Constantinople and Moscow has been a significant factor in this division for years, with some churches aligning with Constantinople, others with Moscow, and some seeking a middle ground. This rift is not only spiritual but also political, as the Orthodox Churches play a crucial role in national identity in Eastern and Southeastern Europe.
The dispute over Ukraine has further exacerbated this tension, with Bartholomew recognizing an independent Ukrainian church five years ago. The recent election of Metropolitan Daniil, one of the candidates who has shown support for Moscow’s influence in the past, can be seen as a success for Russia’s efforts to maintain its grip on Eastern Europe. Despite this victory, other factors were also at play in the election results.
Bulgaria’s ties with Russia have evolved significantly since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, leading to a change in public opinion and political stances within Bulgaria. However, despite the election of a new patriarch, the country’s political leadership remains uncertain due to failed attempts to form a government after recent elections.
In summary, the election of Metropolitan Daniil as Bulgaria’s new patriarch represents more than just a shift in allegiances for the Bulgarian Church; it is also a reflection of how deeply divided Orthodoxy is today and how much influence Russia wields over Eastern Europe.
