Alabama’s ban on health care for transgender adolescents is being challenged by parents who are fighting against the state’s attempt to bypass a trial in the case. They argue that the State’s motion for summary judgment contains false claims about the established standards of medical care for transgender adolescents.
The families challenging the ban believe that a full trial is necessary to ensure that all factual record on the safety and efficacy of transgender health care is fully considered. They highlight the harm suffered by transgender adolescents when they are denied necessary care and point out the purposeful discrimination against transgender people that motivated the ban.
In their filing, the Plaintiffs refute the State’s claims and provide expert evidence about the rigorous development of medical standards for transgender adolescents. They argue that the ban is based on discrimination rather than concerns about health or safety.
Overall, these parents are advocating for a full trial to examine the impact of this ban on transgender adolescents and to address
